The fall protection would be a grey area, but the hard hat would be
required because there are items above him that could fall (off the
tower).
Travis
Microserv
Scott Reed wrote:
Also, someone please clarify. My understanding is
that he is on a ladder, fall protection not required. Had he climbed
the tower to there it would be required. Is this true? And, is hard
hat required when off the ground?
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:54:34 -0600
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Marlon at work...
> Sure looks like he's more than 10ft off the ground with no fall
> protection... don't let OSHA see that... ;)
>
> Also, no hard hat... that alone is a $1,000 fine per incident
(been
> there, done that, have the T-shirt).
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
>
> >http://neofast.net/users/mark/pics/wp/onladder.jpg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
------- End of Original Message -------
__________ NOD32 1.1715 (20060818) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
|
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
