You want me to hang a $500 PC in a box on a non-penetrating roof mount?
Current location has no power, only POE - at 100feet.

Next location up is precisely the same... buildingtop with only POE power
from inside.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 6:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WHY?


> Hi,
>
> You have to connect to the internet backbone somewhere (even if in
multiple locations, etc.). You would simply need a $500 PC at each
connection. Pretty simple.
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
> Travis, my network has no such "central" point.   There is no point where
my
> traffic passes through or can be "mirrored" to a single point at a
building.
>
> In less than a year, it will all be dynamically routed via BGP, through
> physically diverse locations and providers, and again, traffic from  the
> customers will not pass through any place where "logging" can be done.
>
> Nor have I any location to keep such data secure.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] WHY?
>
>
>   Hi,
>
> Although I am totally against this, we are already doing this (and keeping
>     a year's worth of history). Keep in mind we move about 110Mbps of
traffic
> average. We setup a linux box (p4/2.8ghz with 1GB of RAM and a 200GB
drive)
> about a year ago and installed IpAudit. This single box is able to keep up
> with the traffic load and helps us track down customers that are infected,
> SPAMMING, etc.
>   We simply mirror our main incoming port on our backbone switch to
another
>     port, and plug the IpAudit box into that port. Works great. :)
>   Travis
> Microserv
>
> Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
> Why?   Because it will severely burden smaller ISP's that lack the network
> infrastructure to do this.
>
> Is WISPA lobbying against this?   It will be nearly impossible for most of
> us in the wireless business to do this, without major restructuring, or a
> huge expense that we can't afford.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:05 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] WHY?
>
>
>
>
http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6108279.html?part=rss&tag=6108279&subj=news
>     Why would Qwest want ISP's to have to retain this data?
>
> George
>
> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>   -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to