I would think a better approach would be to work with Intel or another
company who is already building prototypes to get a test system built
and have WISPs become the operations portion of a test for this type of
technology. A converted WiFi unit will not have any of the existing GPS
or sniffing capabilities required in the NPRM. If we are going to become
part of the solution then we need to have something capable of doing
what is being asked in the NPRM.
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1813A1.doc
Looks like we're still TWO years away from being able to use the white
spaces. In a month we'll see the first draft rules from the FCC.
It looks like what they want to do is to get some testing data. I'd
like to propose to them that we be allowed to build a few test systems
using 2.4 ghz to tv band converters. Similar to the 2.4 to 900mhz
converters.
I think it's important to have the support of WISPA on this, officially.
Thoughts?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
