Matt, You guys are argueing about irrelevant topics
If memory serves me correctly, you provide non-oversubscribed wireless DIA (leased line replacement) for SMB/Enterprises in a Tier1/2 urban market and sell for $200-400 (if not higher) ARPU Travis provides massively oversubscribed residential bandwidth <wink> and competes against $20-40 access products It's not apples to apples -Charles ------------------------------------------- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:22 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] vendor specs Travis Johnson wrote: > The biggest reason we use Trango is because we sell our wireless > service as symmetrical. Even on the residential level, if they > purchase 512k they get 512k down and 512k up. So, if I use Canopy, I > have to do a 50/50 split, which means even the Advantage product only > provides 7Mbps of "usable" bandwidth. > I understand that one Trango sector can provide more usable bandwidth than one Canopy sector. But, you can have more Canopy sectors on one base station than Trango. Therefore, on a per base station basis Canopy provides superior usable bandwidth. -Matt -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
