Tom,
You have been responding to this whole thread like I have been attacking
your position. I'm not.
My statement in a summary....... Efficient use of the spectrum has
multiple positions. Unfortunately others may not fit into my business
plan.
I am not saying blow them off the air and not work with them. I am
saying that if someone comes along and can't make their new service work
because I occupy the whole band then that sucks to be him. There are
going to be situations where people are going to get interfered with.
If there wasn't, the Commission would have licensed the band as you know.
There will be survivors and there will be descendants.
I like being a survivor....
-B-
BTW: The WAR board is not type accepted. But you know that..... :-P
Tom DeReggi wrote:
You are still totally missing the point...
In doing so you may wipe out or interfere with the poor little WISP 2
miles away. What do you do???
Thats not generally the outcome. If the little WISP down the street
just goes away, there is no problem. But he doesn't because his whole
livelihood is invested in his WISP business. What happens is after
you wipe out the poor little WISP 2 miles away, the little WISP buys
a big club (big radio) and wipes you out back, and smiles after he
Wiped out the poor little you.
This isn't a battle about 15K gear and cheap gear. Its been proven
over and over again that cooperation is more effective than fighting a
WAR.
The BIG rich over confident provider no longer has the upper hand to
bully the little poor WISP2, just because they are better funded. Its
amazing what harm a $200 WARboard and 400mw card will do with a $180
3ft PAC Wireless dish. Not that I'm suggest attempt harm. I'm just
saying WISP2 can now afford to grab just a big a club as you can. This
is a REAL Risk, and equalizes the playing field. You play nice or
everyone looses.
I never said its not occasionally necessary to install over someone
else. You do what you need to do, to get the link done. I simply
suggested to avoid it when you can, unless their was just cause to do
other wise. I just can't understand why participants on this thread
have not grasped this simple principle. If you don't get it by now,
I'm wasting my breath. I'm done with this one.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] high throughput backhaul options
OK...Lets look at this whole issue with one other twist.
Let's say you need a large pipe to carry 100 Mb full duplex between 2
locations. You happen top have a $15K link sitting on the shelf that
you could deploy. In doing so you may wipe out or interfere with the
poor little WISP 2 miles away. What do you do???
Incur more expenses by buying another link that will not cause
interference??
Do you pay the ILEC/CLEC?etc for a 100 Mb pipe???
Or do you put it up and just "go with it"???
I bet I know what most of you would do. Werger or not you will print
it is another issue.
But let's hear it.
What would ya do?????.................
-B-
--
Bob Moldashel
Lakeland Communications, Inc.
Broadband Deployment Group
1350 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, New York 11741 USA
800-479-9195 Toll Free US & Canada
631-585-5558 Fax
516-551-1131 Cell
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
Bob Moldashel
Lakeland Communications, Inc.
Broadband Deployment Group
1350 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, New York 11741 USA
800-479-9195 Toll Free US & Canada
631-585-5558 Fax
516-551-1131 Cell
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
