As I have stated before, the health care providers in this area have it
in their minds (and their policy manuals) that wireless of any kind will
not be suitable for their needs, period. It has nothing to do with
technical reality. It has to do with perception and corporate policy.
Basically health care interests here are not just saying no, they are
saying hell no. It is a hard sell for me at this point and the only
vendor who has supplied me with any backup is one I do not even buy
from, Bridgewave. They sent me technical DOCs, testimonials, etc. from
health care interests. I passed it along to the health care providers in
this area and you could hear crickets, right before the next hell no.
This is frustrating to say the least. If Alvarion or anyone else wants
to help me I am sure I would take the help. It is in all your best
interests since I am not the only wireless provider effected by this
black-balling of our industry by health care interests in my region.
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
Certainly, licensed wireless links and managed firewall delivered by
your team would be cheaper to deliver; faster to deploy; and just as
reliable as fiber?
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
John Scrivner wrote:
I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give
wireless a second thought. Why should they consider wireless if they
can get fiber for virtually free? Like I said...Grrrrr.
Scriv
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
