The Telcos all over are deploying 400 mW units-anything that says 2WIRE is 400 mW.
John >-----Original Message----- >From: Lonnie Nunweiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 09:12 PM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] multi-radio Wi-Fi base stations > >Precisely why X2 cloaking is so important. It doubles the number of >channels and X4 gives 11 of them back to us. X4 gives about 7 mbps >with non compressible data and over 12 mbps with compressible data. >Better than a standard B model with perfect conditions. > >The other thing to keep in mind is that all of those channel 6 units >attached to ADSL lines are typically unused or lightly used. They >connect with an ADSL line and thus cannot even begin to consume the >total air time. > >The Telco here is distributing units with 400 mW radaios whether the >client even wants wireless in their home. It does not even phase a >cloaked connection so we are OK with it. > >Lonnie > >On 2/15/07, Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There USED to be three non overlapping channels. Now channel 6 overlaps >> with every third house in many markets :-). >> Marlon >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Lonnie Nunweiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> >> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:10 AM >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] multi-radio Wi-Fi base stations >> >> >> > Standard Wifi has 3 channels that do not overlap. X4 cloaking has 6 >> > channels that do not overlap and X4 cloaking has 11 channels that do >> > not overlap. >> > >> > We use 4 WLM-54G radios in a WAR4 and have seen no great issues unless >> > two active radios are on the same channel. I am not sure about 6 but >> > I know for sure that 4 works fine. Incidentally the SR9 has almost NO >> > leakage. Even with the cards side by side they will not link up. In >> > order to get anything from them you need a pigtail and an antenna. >> > >> > Lonnie >> > >> > On 2/15/07, Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'd recommend against that idea Matt. ALL devices leak some energy. And >> >> the amount of interference you'll create for yourself at inches vs. feet >> >> is >> >> amazing. If you can keep things 3 feet apart there is much less energy, >> >> small small fractions in fact. >> >> >> >> Alvarion with their FHSS gear can get away with such things because they >> >> can >> >> always stay enough hopping channels away from near by radios. FHSS has >> >> 72 >> >> (or is it only 70?) channels to choose from. WiFi has basically 2 these >> >> days. >> >> >> >> Where this one gets hard to explain is that people build such critters, >> >> test >> >> them in the lap and then say that they work. Life will change >> >> dramatically >> >> however, once installed into a working system AND with the addition of >> >> real >> >> customers with real traffic. >> >> >> >> laters, >> >> marlon >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:24 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] multi-radio Wi-Fi base stations >> >> >> >> >> >> >I thought you were already working with Deliberant on just such an >> >> >animal. >> >> >Where are you guys with that? I know they have a dual radio unit capable >> >> >of >> >> >5 GHz and 2.4 GHz in the same box. >> >> > Scriv >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Matt Liotta wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> We don't do much Wi-Fi, so I figured I would ask the list. If I wanted >> >> >> to >> >> >> deploy a number of Wi-Fi radios at the same location what kind of >> >> >> setups >> >> >> are available? I am looking for something where I can deploy one >> >> >> physical >> >> >> box that has multiple radios as opposed to a single box per radio. >> >> >> Ideally, it would be something modular where I can have a variable >> >> >> number >> >> >> of radio interfaces by simply adding cards. >> >> >> >> >> >> Does anything like that exist? >> >> >> >> >> >> -Matt >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> > >> >> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > >> >> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Lonnie Nunweiler >> > Valemount Networks Corporation >> > http://www.star-os.com/ >> > -- >> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> > >> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> -- >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > >-- >Lonnie Nunweiler >Valemount Networks Corporation >http://www.star-os.com/ >-- >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
