Peter, do you have much information on Network DVR (like the term). I
would think that if you could get DR owners to agreee to Network DVR it
would just be a small jump to real VOD. But then again, I still
struggle with the concept of them bitching about people copying stuff
that they broadcast freely over the air...
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Peter R. wrote:
Remember that like the term wireless, iptv has way too many meanings.
IPTV to the telcos is TV to the cablecos.
By saying IPTV, they figure they get around a lot of stuff and make it
sound better than broadcast TV.
Broadcast TV isn't much of a bandwidth problem - they do it fine today.
TV over the internet will take time since most people don't want to
watch TV on a laptop or PC.
Until the Converged Living Room becomes mainstream, bandwidth won't be
a huge problem.
VOD (video on demand) is being confused with Network DVR.
Instead of home DVR, it will be at the NOC.
Maybe the way hotel on-demand is.
That's what the content companies want.
We'll see. Even DISH promises Caller ID on the TV screen, but that
isn't IPTV.
Just some thoughts this morning.
Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
