Yeah, these new ones are working really well. They had some ethernet issues
in one production run, but I've not had trouble with them for quite a while
now.
The other nice thing about them is that they seem to work just fine in G
mode (not something I've had much luck with with Inscape Data or MT). I did
have to pull one out of g mode and put it back to b for a customer with bad
Vonage performance. A swap to a G cpe might have helped too. Shrug.
I do wish they had radius built in and some kind of spectrum analyzer/ap
browser. But for $200 what's a guy want? grin
marlon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT Babble
Can you use "nice" and Teletronics in the same sentence? ;)
Travis
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I disagree with that.
I can get a nice Teletronics AP for about $220. My last MT solution ran
closer to $500.
I tried MT (lost one of two out there in the first big storm we got)
because I was going to try a solution that would do routing at the ap.
Glad I didn't go that route! I'd still be working to get customers back
online.
It was sure nice to have all of the test modes that the MT has though.
Pretty cool stuff.
marlon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT Babble
I said this several months ago and I'll say it again.... MT and Star-OS
are used because of price. Period.
If the "certified" systems come out and are double the price (so $400
for a RB532 type solution compared with $200 now) how many people are
going to start using the certified ones? Very few. Even if it's only $50
extra, are people really going to pay that much extra when so far they
haven't worried about it?
Travis
Microserv
Matt Liotta wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
Matt
The reason we like stuff MT and Star, it works and we like it.
I'm glad it works and that you like it because you like it. That
doesn't really help me understand why one would choose MT over
something else. I mean there has to be something beyond that you like
it if you are willing to use it in favor of something else that is
certified.
I don't really care for the whole discussion of whether certified gear
should be used or not. Every piece of gear has advantages and
disadvantages as well as pricing considerations. Regardless of whether
someone is willing to use uncertified gear, I am sure that given the
choice between uncertified and certified everyone would choose
certified every time. Therefore, uncertified gear is at a disadvantage
to other gear, so it must make up for this disadvantage some other way
or no one would choose it. What is MT's advantage?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
