Or really, the consumer could just read the contract before they sign 
it. Problem solved. ;)

Travis
Microserv

Larry Yunker wrote:
> I think that the FCC has a bona fide reason for addressing the early
> termination fee issue.  The underlying concern is that early termination
> fees often do not reflect the true cost incurred by the contracting provider
> as a result of the subscriber's breach of contract.
>
>  
>
> In reality, an early termination fee should be prorated over the course of
> the contract such that at the beginning of the contract term, the cost
> includes the full cost of equipment, installation, and acquisition which has
> been lost due to that customer.  Whereas, as the subscriber nears the end of
> his term, there should be very little cost remaining to be recovered.
>
>  
>
> The problems that arise are these:
>
> (1) Early termination fees are often too low to cover the full cost of the
> equipment/installation, so companies "average-out" losses by cost-shifting. 
>
>
>
> For example assume Customer A and Customer B both sign up for 2 year terms
> with a $200.00 early termination fee and each received equipment and
> installation worth $350.00.  Customer A drops in month 1, so the Service
> Provider loses its entire $350.00 investment.  Customer B drops in month 23
> so the Service Provider has recouped most 95% of its $350.00 investment.
> The Service Provider loses $150.00 on Customer A but gains roughly $182.00
> by overcharging Customer B.  This system shifts the cost burden from those
> who drop early to those who drop late.
>
>  
>
> (2) Customers are usually not made aware of the costs of the equipment and
> installation that they are receiving as part of their package deal.  If
> customer's understood that their neat new Razor phone actually costs
> $350.00, they might opt to keep their old phone longer or they might not buy
> at all.  Similarly in the broadband arena, if the DSL subscriber understood
> that the DSL/Wireless router costs $100 and the DSLAM port costs $200, they
> might think twice before signing up for 2 years at $20.00 a month. 
>
>  
>
> (3) Providers lose some of their incentive to maintain quality service
> and/or customer service when they know that their clients are under an
> oppressive contract which limits their ability to choose an alternative
> provider.  
>
> For example: If a provider knows that their customer is on a 2 year term
> with a $200.00 early termination fee and that provider charges the customer
> $40.00 per month for service, the provider has very little incentive to
> respond to the customer during the last 5 months of the contract.  During
> that period, the provider stands to gain more from the early termination
> than they do through the subscription fees!
>
>  
>
> Potential Solutions to these problems:
>
> (1)    Require disclosure and option to pay actual installation, equipment,
> and acquisition fees in lieu of early termination fees.
>
> (2)    Require that cancellation fees reflect the actual cost of
> installation, equipment, and acquisition fees. (This one is pretty
> idealistic. providers will almost always eat some cost and pass it along
> through subscription fees).
>
> (3)    Require proration of early termination fees so that the cost-shifting
> described above CANNOT OCCUR.
>
> (4)    Allow/Encourage/Require? competing providers to buy-out the prorated
> balance of any early termination fee for a new customer that wants to switch
> to that new provider.  Often the cost of buying out a prorated balance will
> be less than the cost of new customer acquisition, so it would be a win-win
> for the new provider and the new customer.
>
> (5)    Encourage interoperability of equipment between providers or provide
> some realistic secondary market for customer equipment so that costs of
> switching carriers could be mitigated.  Make "locking phones" and/or CPE
> illegal wherever the customer "owns" the equipment.
>
> (6)    Provide a mechanism for regulation of minimum standards of service,
> if a provider cannot meet the minimum standard of service then a customer
> should be released from his contract without penalty and the equipment
> should be returned to the provider. 
>
> a.    This idea could be established in the cell phone industry by recording
> a baseline of coverage within the first 30 days of new service and comparing
> changes in coverage to that first 30 day baseline.  If the coverage drops
> significantly from the baseline then the customer would have a basis for
> dropping without penalty.  In the fixed wireless business, this process
> could be more difficult due to the uncertainty of outside interference, but
> the concept remains the same.  Set a baseline, set a minimum threshold and
> create a procedure for testing against that threshold.
>
>  
>
> Well that's my two cents worth. hopefully some of these ideas make it
> through to the powers-that-be in D.C.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Larry Yunker, J.D. 
>
> Network Consultant
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Travis Johnson
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] FCC changes
>
>  
>
> This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast...
>
>  
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/30/AR2008053002
> 776.html
>
>  
>
> We charge 100% of the remaining contract because we are eating the cost 
>
> on the equipment and rolling a truck (for both installation and pickup). 
>
> Now they want to regulate how much we can charge for early termination. :(
>
>  
>
> Travis
>
> Microserv
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
>  
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>  
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>  
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to