I would argue that this issue would be something best under the jurisdiction 
of Federal Courts, not the FCC or States.
Any service that is provided to a consumer for use in Multiple States, makes 
it overly encumbersome for the provider or consumer to have to address it 
legally with MULTIPLE State Courts.
Not that I am saying that their is any Legal support for my above comments.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Yunker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes


> Whether it is the "job" of the FCC to ensure fairness with regards to
> telecommunications contracts is yet to be determined.  Traditionally, 
> STATE
> COURTS have resolved contractual disputes.  However, in 2005, a cell 
> carrier
> named SunCom filed a petition with the FCC asking the FCC to declare that
> early termination fees fall under "rate charged" doctrine and therefore 
> fall
> under the exclusive jurisdiction of the FCC (thus blocking STATE COURTS 
> from
> rendering decisions against the cell carrier).  The FCC has held comment 
> on
> the issue and was thought to be getting close to a ruling on the issue 
> when
> SunCom suddenly and unexpectedly SETTLED their case (March 21, 2008) with
> their client(s) and dropped the petition for the declaratory ruling.
>
> The net effect is that the FCC hasn't decided whether early termination 
> fees
> as a contractual issue are strictly a FEDERAL issue to be decided by the 
> FCC
> or if they are a traditional common law issue to be decided at the state
> level.  The meetings later this month may shed some further light on how
> ETF's will be adjudicated in the future.  It certainly appears that the 
> FCC
> is moving towards regulation of the marketplace.
>
> Don't take my comments to be weighing in favor of FCC regulation of this
> issue.  I believe that state courts could certainly resolve these disputes
> just as well as the FCC (albeit inconsistently across state lines). 
> Common
> law contract law as well as consumer protection statutes would address 
> many
> of the concerns that have been raised with regards to early termination
> fees.  The problem that we have today is that many state & federal courts
> have placed litigation regarding early termination fees on hold UNTIL the
> FCC declares whether or not they are going to completely preempt the field
> of telecommunication termination fees.  This indecision by the FCC has 
> held
> up litigation for up to three years in state and federal courts.  The main
> thing that we need right now is definitive action of some sort so that
> subscribers have rights either in state court or before the FCC and so 
> that
> PROVIDERS have some sense of direction with regards to their obligations 
> or
> limitations under common law and regulatory regimes.
>
> - Larry
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:12 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> <insert witty tagline here>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Larry Yunker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
>
>
>> Travis,
>>
>> I agree wholeheartedly that a customer should be held to the terms of a
>> contract and certainly should be responsible for reading and accepting 
>> the
>> terms of the agreement.
>>
>> The issue is that some contracts are designed to penalize rather than
>> recoup
>> costs.
>
>
> Again... So?   It is not the job of government to "ensure" that everything 
> a
>
> customer chooses to do is "made fair" for him.
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to