That's nice, but in real life the FCC has simply gotten on a tear and decided that NOTHING qualifies for what they want.
I have no idea what the purpose of this rather odd bit of nonsense is about, but when it declares that 802.11 "does not detect dissimilar systems", then nothing can EVER be made to work. After all, the whole "listen before talk" is AN RF ENERGY DETECTOR. If that doesn't work, nothing can. Or, only that device or mechanism the person passing judgement wants to promote will "work". We would spectulate who has bought this favor from the FCC, but in reality, it doesn't matter. I predict NO equipment will be certified for the rest of the spectrum and it will be auctioned for big bucks to some large entity. We'll still be in the same boat 2 years from now, with statements about "we're watching the development of <insert technology du jour here> with interest". ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ <insert witty tagline here> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:28 PM Subject: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP > Update from the FCC. This makes is very clear to me what the FCC is > looking > for, if there are any questions or comments feel free. > > Sincerely, Tony Morella > Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider > Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 > http://www.demarctech.com > > > "Tony: > Thank you for your inquiry. > > In the email you mentioned that several companies have obtained equipment > authorization for operation in the lower 25 MHz of the 3650-3700 MHz band. > This is correct. In the Commission's evaluation these devices met the > requirements for restricted contention based protocol operation. Thus all > of these devices support contention based protocol, but they only support > that for similar types of systems. They do not provide for recognizing > and > coexistence with other dissimilar systems. > > In order to obtain the authorization for the full 50 MHz operation the > system has to demonstrate coexistence with different protocols. At the > present time the Commission reviews each application on its merit to > determine if the system meets the requirements for such unrestricted > operation. The Commission is monitoring the progress of IEEE 802.16h and > 802.11y working groups in terms of their plans to extend their respective > protocols to support coexistence. We are encouraged by this development > and > think that they are in the right direction. However, it is not a > precondition for authorization. In the absence of any industry standard, > we > treat each application on a case-by-case basis. One of the tests we do > apply is the co-existence analysis recommendation currently under review > by > the 802.19 committee. We would expect to see some simulation to show how > the proposed system would behave in the presence of other systems, the > back-off strategies employed and approaches to fair sharing mechanisms. > > Please let us know if you have further questions. > Thank you, > Rashmi Doshi, PhD > Chief, FCC Laboratory Division" > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
