Thank You , Forrest. Concise and to the point.
Ron Wallace 
Hahnron, Inc. 
220 S. Jackson Dt. 
Addison, MI 49220 

Phone: (517)547-8410 
Mobile: (517)270-2410 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-----Original Message-----
From: Forrest W Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 02:52 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Topic change - Trade Association Was: Report: 
FCCtoPunishComcast Over Web Blocking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in relation to a previous statement about CALEA being 
good for WISPA: > I can find NO benefit to it of ANY > kind. Nor has anyone I 
know of explained a single "benefit", ever. It is > a mandate on how a network 
must function, a limitation to equipment, > software, topology, and redundancy, 
and an absurd notion in the first place. > It is a direct requirement to 
dumb-down and overbuild bandwidth, with NO > return of ANY kind, financial or 
otherwise. From my perspective, almost everyone in the WISP industry got 
broadsided by the whole CALEA thing... But by the time everyone was aware of 
the requirements, it was too late to do anything meaningful as far as the rules 
themselves. What WISPA did was diffuse a potentially very bad and very 
expensive situation for WISP's. In short, the standards which WISPA developed 
and got approved basically says that you have to be able to packet sniff the 
data and provide it to the LEA. One actual statement in the 
 APPROVED standard says: "In unusual cases it may be impossible to perform one 
or more of these functions. The WISP is expected to make a best effort attempt 
to satisfy these requirements." It doesn't say you have to redesign your 
network. It doesn't say you have to dumb down a network. It doesn't say you 
have to overbuild bandwidth. Go ahead read the standard.. and realize that the 
ability to comply with this very easy to comply with standard is your safe 
harbor.... all thanks to the hard work provided by WISPA. You can choose how 
much you want to do to prepare. True, you may have to go put a packet sniffer 
at an AP site in response to a intercept request, but I suspect that would have 
been the case before CALEA as well. -forrest 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to