|
YES! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These post bring back memories from the Karlnet days of Karlnet vs. non Karlnet systems :)Michiana Wireless, Inc. John Buwa, President http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com 574-233-7170 "Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!" *US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Ferre Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 4:38 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations It's not about the upload speed, it's about the packets per second. Get just one customer with computer infected with some decent virus and it will generate 5000 packets per seconds, which may account to only 256kbps in raw traffic terms. But with regular Access Point this will bring your AP to the knees or even worse and there is NOTHING you can do about it. You could try to limit packet per second that customer but it will only happen after the traffic hits Access Point and will not stop the viri operation. Or get some customer with few uncapped p2p apps and you will see pretty much the same. Sorry, polling is the only way to go. Every mature network type uses some type of polling scheme (from cellular 'time slots' through WiMAX to all MMDS systems) and it's there for a reason. And it's one really good reason - performance. Matt |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
