I am surprised an open source project has not sprung up to do this.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Japhy Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations


> Maybe Mikrotik should take a note from Microsoft's book..  Remember
> how we went through the whole Apple/Windows game?  How the company
> that wrote software for specific hardware lost - hard?
>
> For me, (and perhaps the low-end market!) I really just want a
> card/enclosure/poe/N-connector that I can flash with Linux or
> something similar; why everyone wants to make their own proprietary
> firmware sort of baffles me - why not tap into all of the very good
> code already written and being developed?
>
> Unless you are trying to deliver a commercial, polished product aimed
> at users who are less savvy about the guts and want an easier admin.
> solution.  I.e., Windows and Apple.
>
> Look at how the PC market converged towards x86!  If Mikrotik or some
> of the other big firmware companies pressured the hardware market into
> some sort of interchangeable hardware standard, we wouldn't need to
> "port" every stinking firmware flavor.
>
> Just saying, I think that Windows is arguably the most successful
> business model .. ever?
>
> And just as a last thought - nobody's really said, "well this firmware
> does X better".  Is there anything particularly different between
> Mikrotik, or StarOS or AirOS?
>
> - japhy
>
>
>>
>> And no, I am not saying Mikrotik is evil. They are just a profit
>> oriented company with clear idea how to explore their market share and
>> having a really solid businessplan. And just as you will never see
>> Microsoft supporting Linux type software, you will never see Mikrotik
>> supporting NS2/5. Though it's likely you may see Mikrotik version of
>> hardware pretty much the same as NS2/5 sometime soon.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/08, Sam Tetherow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> While you may be right on their focus being RB+ROS.  I don't understand
>>> why they would not want to sell a $40 license on a piece of hardware
>>> giving them a theoretical profit of close to $40.  Hardware has to be
>>> manufactured and shipped and warrantied to some extent.  If they are
>>> already writing the software to go with their hardware, why not pick up
>>> the extra sale on someone elses hardware at next to no addtional cost.
>>>
>>> People buying the NS2/5 are doing it from a cost standpoint.  Even with
>>> an additional $40 for a software license it would be 110 for a compact
>>> unit with integrated antenna, dual polarity and a POE.  That is $10 less
>>> than just the crossroads board with no POE, antenna or enclosure.   It
>>> would cost another 50% for a rootenna and POE.
>>>
>>> If they worked with Ubiquiti they would have a chance to own the lowend
>>> market and finally have certified gear out there.  The upgrade path
>>> would be perfect for their hardware.  They would sell the AP hardware as
>>> well as higher end CPEs for business and backhauls and  still make
>>> $40/CPE on the cheap end.  And the operator has a 100% end to end ROS
>>> network.  I wonder if they are making $40 on a crossroads after
>>> manufacture and shipping.  I really don't see the downside to this,
>>> especially if the hardware is similar to the crossroads and ubiquiti
>>> really expressed and interest in working with them.
>>>
>>> Well, if MT doesn't want the business, I wonder if Lonnie is 
>>> interested...
>>>
>>>     Sam Tetherow
>>>     Sandhills Wireless
>>>
>>> Matt Ferre wrote:
>>>> Looking at the posts on the Mikrotik forum I'd say Mikrotik doesn't
>>>> exactly like Ubiquiti. And from business point of view I can clearly
>>>> see why.
>>>>
>>>> Who exactly would benefit from porting Mikrotik to NS5? Mikrotik? No,
>>>> their Routerboard sales would drop and as we see during last two years
>>>> they are more into selling Routerboard + Routeros package than the
>>>> software alone. Ubiquiti would be the main beneficiary of that
>>>> situation and that's why you're not going to see it happen. Never
>>>> ever.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Oswave says there is no NS2/5 support and will not be. DD-WRT has
>>>>>> support. That is a shame since ros/sos seam not to have plans to
>>>>>> support them. I wonder how much effort/money it would be to get
>>>>>> Ubiquity to solicit a firmware from someone?
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My understanding (this is "friend of a friend" quality info) is that
>>>> MT and Ubiquity DID have discussions about the NS platform.  It is
>>>> not something that is going to happen "out of the box", however with
>>>> a 16M flash that Travis mentioned, perhaps it is something that
>>>> could be done.  I mean, the cost would be just $45 for the nLevel4
>>>> license and only about $23 or so (I can't recall the available
>>>> pricing) for nLevel3 plus the hardware cost.
>>>>
>>>> -- ********************************************************************
>>>> *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * *Network Engineering
>>>> *MikroTik RouterOS * *573-276-2879 *ImageStream *
>>>> *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE *
>>>> *http://blog.butchevans.com/ *Wired or wireless Networks * *Mikrotik
>>>> Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer *
>>>> ********************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to