It sounds like what you really have to do is tighten up your webmail. It's better to fix that than to put a band-aid on it. Though a good smtp spam filter is never a bad idea.
Greg On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:37 PM, David E. Smith wrote: > os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: >> I agree, those dedicated boxes are expensive and then there's the >> annual fee as well correct? > > Yeah, you'd have to keep up the Barracuda subscription on your > outgoing > filter as well, if you want to block "current" viruses and such from > leaving your network. > >> I think I'd go with Endian on a PC. Is your spam assassin running >> native or as a virtual machine? > > My copy of SpamAssassin is on a (virtualized, but that shouldn't > matter) > CentOS Linux system. I've basically disabled all the per-user stuff, > and > used a fairly relaxed scoring setup. Since it'll be silently > discarding > mail, I want to be pretty darn sure it's not discarding false- > positives. > Aside from a few edge cases, the whole thing works pretty well and > only > took me a few hours to figure out. > > David Smith > MVN.net > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
