Interesting, I never would have thought that much.  I was thinking more of
about 3-4 degrees.


-----Original Message-----
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 Downtilt at 300'

I disagree,  Precise Tilt does matter quite a bit with Tiltek 900Mhz 
sectors.

Let me give an example of mounted at 400ft with Tiltek sectors having 17 deg

vert beamwidth.

8 deg downtilt, min .25 miles, max horizon.

9 degree downtilt, min .24 miles, max 8.6 miles.

10 degree downtilt, Min distance .22 miles, Max distance 2.8 miles.

11 deg downtilt, min .21 miles, Max 1.7 miles

Near field coverage is rarely a problem with 900Mhz, regardless of the tilt.
But what people forget is how much the far field is effected by just a 
single degree.

The difference between 9 versus10 degrees is the difference of "5 miles !" 
coverage at optimal signal strength.
The difference between 8 versus 10 degrees is the difference of whether you 
interfere with your other towers 30 miles away versus 3 miles away.

With 900Mhz, EVERY DB counts. The reason is two fold.  1) The noise floor is

ften high. 2) Its very easy to get colocated AP antenna self interference, 
when foliage can degrade the signal of a single link severally. For example,

the Front-to-back isolation loss could be equivellent to the loss of foliage

in a path.

The goal is to get the highest signal uniformally to the largest area within

your desired coverage area. Then you can always lower CPE transmit power as 
needed on links without foliage loss.  In my 900 deployments, I have found 
that 3db lost or gained can be the difference between a typically good 
versus bad link.

Now, its true the above beamwidths are only the distances that show "3 db" 
loss, so a 10 degree downtilt, sector will still have a significant amount 
of signal going out to and heard from the the horizon. But every DB counts.

The critical question becomes do you mount high or not? Higher avoids more 
trees. HIgher hears more interference. We found what was best for us was to 
go higher, but add more downtilt. We shoot for 10 degree downtilt. But it 
can be a delicate balance, dependent on your environment and noise levels 
and locations. We will usally put a larger focus on reducing noise to our 
adjacent cell sites, even if at the cost of gain to our intended coverage 
area.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cliff Olle" <w...@eccentrixtechnologies.com>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:25 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 900 Downtilt at 300'


> For the 900 Mhz connectorized AP (by cyclone) with the 120 tiltek antenna,
> if I am mounted at 300', what amount of down tilt is normal?
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1991 - Release Date: 3/9/2009 
> 7:14 AM
>
> 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to