I hear ya. If not by bridging, what other option could be used to move the public IP? I NAT everything, public IP's big mega mucho $$ for me, hate it. Can you route the public through a network that is all NAT? Just for future knowledge........
Bob- -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Public IP behind Transparent Bridge On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 15:45, Robert West <robert.w...@just-micro.com>wrote: > Before I start tearing into things and make a mess for myself, can one have > a public IP behind a transparent bridge? Yup. I can vouch for Josh Luthman's instructions. Heck, I have the whole "turn a pair of Mikrotik radios into transparent bridges" instructions down to a one-pager, suitable for the field techs to use. While many on this list preach that bridging is bad (and they're often right), the ability to turn a pair of boards into an easy drop-in replacement/upgrade for older bridging-only gear (Trango 5800, I'm looking at you) is a powerful one. David Smith MVN.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
