<chuckle> Well, for what it's worth I hope *you* are right and *I* am wrong 
;-). Damn I hate betting against the outcome I _want_ to see!

Chuck

On Mar 13, 2010, at 11:37 AM, RickG wrote:

> Chuck,
> 
> You're perceptive on the reasons I didnt "hear" of it, I probably just
> didnt pay attention as it didnt seem to apply or it just got lost in
> all the topics.
> 
> As I've mentioned before, I did "pay by the bit" back in '98 when I
> was GM at a small cable co. I only imposed it on bandwidth hogs and it
> worked well. The reason I havent switched to it with this company is
> that so far its not worth the hassle.
> 
> With that said, I'll see your prediction and raise you:)
> TCP/IP will eventually be the only pipe for all communications. Once
> that happens, the cable co will utilize their billing model for
> television. It may not be bill by the bit but they will certainly
> charge a premium for advanced services.
> 
> -RickG
> 
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Chuck Bartosch
> <ch...@clarityconnect.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:20 PM, RickG wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually, yes, this is the first I've heard about it. Obviously, I'm
>>> not a sports fan :)
>> 
>> I was initially surprised you hadn't heard of it before too because you're 
>> pretty active on list and it's been discussed numerous times and in detail 
>> over the past 15 months but maybe it was on another list (the WISPA members 
>> list?). Or, like the Form 477 discussions a few years ago that I personally 
>> skipped over for a long time, maybe it was just an ignored thread topic 
>> (given our propensity to not start new threads for new topics, that wouldn't 
>> be surprising). Most of us heard of it either due to customer complaints or 
>> because of the list discussion.
>> 
>> For what it's worth, I honestly don't think the industry will ever move 
>> en-mass to a pay-by-the-bit model. True, it makes the most sense from an 
>> operator standpoint, but it's just too easy to get undercut by a competitor 
>> who doesn't do it, the big companies that would have to do it first for it 
>> to go mainstream invariably chicken out too quickly or mess it up by doing 
>> it in a high-handed fashion that pisses everyone off, or politicians will 
>> get involved to defeat the model. That's *my* prediction.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>>> I've never had a customer request. I've have mixed feelings about
>>> this. Coming from the cable world, I was used to paying providers for
>>> channel content. The difference was, we didnt have to pay for
>>> bandwidth. Now, everyone wants to ride the bandwidth that we pay for
>>> to get to our customer. Maybe big bad ESPN should pay us?
>>> .05/sub/month doesnt sound like much but it adds up real fast. Worse
>>> yet, you still pay even though not everyone wants or needs it. Oh, and
>>> just what we need, another paper to fill out.
>>> I've been predicting since '97 that we'll have to charge the billing
>>> model to charge by the bit and that day is getting closer each time
>>> things like this occur.
>>> -RickG
>>> BTW: I did dial-up back in '93 and never paid for a TCP/IP stack or
>>> the Browser :)
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Tim Sylvester <t...@avanzarnetworks.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> I'm confused by this message. Are you saying you just heard of ESPN360? It
>>>> has been around since 2007.
>>>> 
>>>> How much do you think big bad ESPN charges for ESPN360? I have seen
>>>> estimates between $0.05/sub/month to $0.25/sub/month. As far as I can tell,
>>>> any ISP can contact ESPN and sign-up to offer ESPN360 to their subscribers.
>>>> Here's a link to the current list of ISPs offering ESPN360:
>>>> http://espn.go.com/broadband/espn360/affList. The list of providers ranges
>>>> from ATT and Verizon each with over 10M subs. Down to the Spencer Iowa
>>>> Municipal Utilities and Spruce Knob Seneca Rocks Telephone, each with a few
>>>> thousand subs.
>>>> 
>>>> The list includes cable, DSL and FTTH ISPs. The only thing that might
>>>> prevent a WISP from offering ESPN360 is bandwidth.
>>>> 
>>>> ESPN360 is just an add-on service that an ISP can bundle with their service
>>>> offerings to customers. Think of it like offering e-mail accounts or web
>>>> sites. In the mid 90s, ISPs had to pay to provide a TCP/IP stack and a web
>>>> browser to their customers.
>>>> 
>>>> If the WISPA members think ESPN360 would be a useful to offer their
>>>> customers, have someone contact ESPN to see if you can negotiate an ESPN360
>>>> contract for all WISPA members.
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>>> Behalf Of RickG
>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:57 AM
>>>>> To: WISPA General List
>>>>> Subject: [WISPA] here it come$
>>>>> 
>>>>> The television content providers are going to bill ISP's?
>>>>> Try using ESPN Live 360 and see what it tells you.
>>>>> -RickG
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> 
>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>> 
>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>> 
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> 
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>> 
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> 
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
>> --------------
>> Chuck Bartosch
>> Clarity Connect, Inc.
>> 200 Pleasant Grove Road
>> Ithaca, NY 14850
>> (607) 257-8268
>> 
>> "When the stars threw down their spears,
>> and water'd heaven with their tears,
>> Did He smile, His work to see?
>> Did He who made the Lamb make thee?"
>> 
>>> From William Blake's Tiger!, Tiger!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--------------
Chuck Bartosch
Clarity Connect, Inc.
200 Pleasant Grove Road
Ithaca, NY 14850
(607) 257-8268

"When the stars threw down their spears,
and water'd heaven with their tears,
Did He smile, His work to see?
Did He who made the Lamb make thee?"

>From William Blake's Tiger!, Tiger!





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to