I read a bit about ethtool and then gave it a shot but this was all I got. I iterated through eth0 through eth12 and got nothing.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Cannot get device settings: No such device Cannot get wake-on-lan settings: No such device Cannot get message level: No such device Cannot get link status: No such device No data available XM.v5.2# ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: Cannot get device settings: No such device Cannot get wake-on-lan settings: No such device Cannot get message level: No such device Cannot get link status: No such device No data available XM.v5.2# ethtool eth2 Settings for eth2: Cannot get device settings: No such device Cannot get wake-on-lan settings: No such device Cannot get message level: No such device Cannot get link status: No such device No data available On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Michael Baird wrote: > They are linux based. > > Use ethtool <interface> > > Regards > Michael Baird >> I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet >> port is connected to the NanostationM5's "secondary" port. The NanostationM5 >> is doing POE pass through and powering the BulletM2. The NanostationM5 the >> BulletM2 is connected to is the far end of a pair of NanostationM5's acting >> as a backhaul. >> >> I've had some intermittent problems on the network and I wanted to rule out >> a flaky ethernet cable or connection so I decided to disable auto negotiate >> on the ethernet port and to force 100Mbps full duplex to see if the problem >> could be exacerbated to help locate it. When I force the BulletM2 and >> NanostationM5 to 100Mbps full duplex connectivity between them is lost. I >> thought "good, I've got a bad cable" so I replaced the cable. Still no good. >> Tried another. Still no good. The units are close together and connected >> together with a 6' cable. After trying various cables I still can't get >> forced 100Mbps full duplex to work. With 100Mbps full dup forced there is no >> connectivity, not even ping. >> >> If I revert to auto negotiate they connect fine. >> >> I'm assuming they are connecting at 100Mbps and probably full duplex because >> if I run a speed test from the BulletM2 to the far NanostationM5 (data path >> is from the BulletM2 through the ethernet cable to the close NanostationM5, >> then across the wireless connection (AirMax, no ptp ack) to the far >> NanostationM5) I'm seeing speeds of 95Mbps both directions with a combined >> speed of double that so it seems like things are running very well in both >> directions simultaneously. >> >> Is there any way through SSH or scripting to get the UBNT gear to report >> what speed has been negotiated on the ethernet port using auto negociate? >> >> Could this be a bug in the firmware? >> >> Thanks! >> Greg >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
