Faisal, I was hoping you would reply! My answers inline below: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappydsl.net> wrote: > do the ususal stuff... > > Try changing channel ?
Yes. Tried all available channels. > Try to shrink the channel to 10mhz or 5mhz Yes. Results were just as bad if not worse. > > Any possibility of water in the cables ? or something phyiscally off > with the coax jumpers ? I tried multiple new cables. Plus, eliminated cables by using the Nanobridge. >(AP side ?) > > Since you have done everything on the far side. how about looking at the > AP Side.... It's possible. Going there now. But, other link off sector is working well albeit a bit degraded compared to what it was when originally installed. > > > Run ...Airview to see if there is interference that is not being picked > up on site survey ? Airview channel usage attached. I didnt realize you have to save each scan separately. WIll get all results later. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet& Telecom > > On 8/5/2010 4:01 PM, RickG wrote: >> Here is a good one! >> >> I have a short "link" of about 3 miles from my main tower to another. >> On the main tower I have four UBNT 5G-20-90's with RockeyM5's running >> firmware 5.2. All have performed very well since I installed them >> earlier this year. On the other end at the problem tower I have a 26Db >> grid with a BulletM5 also running fw5.2. The link was doing well until >> two days ago. Then, the latency went through the roof. I assumed it >> was the radio but after switching it out twice, I decided to blame the >> antenna. So, I swapped out the grids multiple times. Then decided to >> try a Nanostation, and a Nanobridge but got worse results. I'd blame >> the sector on the main tower but another link on it remains working >> well. There is a topology difference between the working link and the >> poor link with the later being higher. There is some noise in the area >> but not unusual. What I do note is that the main tower does not "see" >> the far end very well (-78) and it should really be much higher. The >> receive rate is only 6.5Mbps. >> >> At any rate, I've got about 3 dozen subs on this tower and worked on >> it until 5am so I'm ready for some fresh input! >> >> Thanks in advance! >> -RickG >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >
<<attachment: TiptonRoad5HPOL-SA.png>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
