Right, allows sync between GROUPS. GROUPS can be as large as you want as long 
as the MASTER can be reached via Layer2 in less than 30ms. If you have two 
GROUPS (for example two tower sites) that can hear each other but can't be 
reached via Layer2 or latency goes above 30ms between them, then the MASTERS at 
both towers will need to have fixed DL%

UBNT's GPS implementation is a little different than we are used to, but I like 
that they did away with the CMM concept. I am not sure I like the ide of 
depending on one radio for MASTER sync information. I would like to see some 
code that allows for failover. Something like:
- APRadio1 is MASTER/MASTER
- APRadio2 is SLAVE/MASTER

The rest of the SLAVES in the group look at APRadio11 for sync info and if it's 
not there look at APRadioMAC2

- Jerry

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 9:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] GPS Sync / or Sync between devices at site without GPS 
Question

Ubiquiti's next software release is supposed to have dynamic ratios with sync.




-----

Mike Hammett

Intelligent Computing Solutions

http://www.ics-il.com



On 1/10/2011 11:25 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Yes, with wifi based radio systems you can see less throughput with sync than 
without.

With Canopy the DL% is fixed regardless if the AP is getting the sync pulse 
from GPS or generating it itself. i.e. if you set the DL% to 75% it's fixed 
regardless if the bandwidth is being used or not.

With .11 radios the DL% is dynamic and will adjust according to demand (which 
is why they are NOT in sync with other .11 radios). When you sync them, the DL 
is no longer dynamic. So if you had a .11-based BH that has 90% downlink 
traffic and force it to sync the DL% may only be 50% which would look like half.

Does that help?

- Jerry

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 7:31 AM
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com<mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>; WISPA General 
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] GPS Sync / or Sync between devices at site without GPS 
Question

I do not know how the Radwin Sync works. With Canopy, you do not lose bandwidth 
unless you do not have the timing the same. You can adjust settings in such a 
way as to not step on yourself and still have different bandwidth profiles with 
Canopy.

I do not see why sync would lose any bandwidth, unless it is cause now you only 
have X Transit tie and Y receive tie instead of X+%Y.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Scott Carullo 
<sc...@brevardwireless.com<mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote:
For the first time I synchronized multiple devices (two backhauls) at a tower 
site to see what it was all about.  All of our gear in the past did not have 
the capability to sync across devices to save spectrum and/or reduce 
interference between local devices.

In this case I used two Radwin 2000C backhauls with a sync cable between them.  
Setting up the sync between them was easy however the first thing I noticed was 
that the available bandwidth was cut in half.  Is this typical of all synced 
units?  I guess there would be no more reduction in speed after the first two 
radios synced because if there were more they would all fire at the same time 
any way.  Did I loose bandwidth because they were in MIMO mode rather than 
Diversity mode or is the slowdown just a function of the timing reduction to 
keep things clean?

Is the UBNT GPS sync gear going to provide less throughput than I currently 
experience when their new sync capable gear comes out?

Thanks, just trying to get some feedback to learn more about how Syncing 
devices affects their performance.
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102

Error! Filename not specified.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

________________________________

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3370 - Release Date: 01/09/11









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

________________________________

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3371 - Release Date: 01/10/11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to