A single-channel bandpass
filter will help most poor-to-middling receivers by protecting
it from overloading from the off-channel signals that the cheap
receiver front-end would otherwise let come barging in,
desensitizing the receiver and reducing the signal-to-noise
ratio. On 3/14/2011 5:53 AM, Rogelio wrote: For what it's worth, I had a super noisy Wi-Fi noise environment (hundreds of clients, dozens of APs, little to no channel coordination, etc) and got a handle on the situation by putting these band pass filtershttp://www.rflinx.com/products/filters/2400/bpf/ I got several of each, but I ended up using channel 1 mostly. When I put that puppy in, I got like 40 dB less noise on the channels I didn't want, and I also could not even hear other APs when I moved the radio to channels 2-11 (there is that much isolation in the filter). Now throughput is much smoother and higher. Before I put these in, bandwidth would be slow and come in spurts (as evidenced by various throughput tools like iperf and online speed tests). -- Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. Author (2003) - "Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks" Serving the WISP, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 jun...@ask-wi.com |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/