In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65?  
Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
 

Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


-----Original Message-----
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue 
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst 
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> What was the signal of the first link in 900?
>
> On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, "Simon Westlake" <si...@powercode.com
> <mailto:si...@powercode.com>> wrote:
>  > I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
>  >
>  > The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
>  > if 3.65GHz could handle it.
>  >
>  > I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
>  > linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
> horrible.
>  >
>  > But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
>  >
>  > I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
>  > situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
>  > low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
>  > NSM365.
>  >
>  > Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
>  >
>  > I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
>  > with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
> 900MHz.
>  >
>  > On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
>  >> How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
>  >> only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
>  >> switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks
>  >>
>  >> Patrick Nix, Jr.,
>  >> Computer Network Solutions
>  >> CSWEB.NET <http://CSWEB.NET> Internet Services
>  >> IT Manager
>  >>
>  >> http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
>  >> http://www.csweb.net
>  >>
>  >> (918) 235-0414
>  >>
>  >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >> Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
>  >> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>  >> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
>  >> destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
>  >> person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
> illegal.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>  >> http://signup.wispa.org/
>  >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>  >>
>  >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>  >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  >>
>  >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>  >
>  > --
>  > Simon Westlake
>  > si...@powercode.com <mailto:si...@powercode.com>
>  > (920) 351-1010
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>  > http://signup.wispa.org/
>  >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>  >
>  > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>  > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  >
>  > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to