1 watt per MHz limit in 3650.

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 6/22/2011 11:29 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a 25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends. That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.

What's wrong with 25 watts and 7Mhz channels?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jerry Richardson <jrichard...@aircloud.com <mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com>> wrote:

    When deploying 3.65 you'll want to consider that
    - There is only 25MHz of spectrum to use, you'll have nowhere to
    run if you have interference
    - To get three AP's on a tower you'll probably have to use to use
    7MHz channels (using the 5.5 beta2 software)
    - 7MHz channel will get get ~15Mbps TCP (maybe higher but I doubt it)
    - You'll absolutely need the GPS versions

    However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go
    with a 25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP
    and CPE ends. That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT
    leaves no room for growth.


    - Jerry


    -----Original Message-----
    From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
    [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
    Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
    To: WISPA General List
    Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

    In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with
    UBNT 3.65?  Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common
    Carrier, Non-Common, or Private?

    Thanks,

    Patrick Nix, Jr.,
    Computer Network Solutions
    CSWEB.NET <http://CSWEB.NET> Internet Services
    IT Manager
    http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
    http://www.csweb.net
    (918) 235-0414 <tel:%28918%29%20235-0414>


    Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
    confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
    e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any
    dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
    the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
    [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake
    Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
    To: WISPA General List
    Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

    It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
    though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
    case 3.65GHz scenario.

    On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
    > What was the signal of the first link in 900?
    >
    > On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, "Simon Westlake" <si...@powercode.com
    <mailto:si...@powercode.com>
    > <mailto:si...@powercode.com <mailto:si...@powercode.com>>> wrote:
    > > I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles
    with 3.65GHz.
    > >
    > > The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a
    test to see
    > > if 3.65GHz could handle it.
    > >
    > > I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a
    test. It is
    > > linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
    > horrible.
    > >
    > > But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
    > >
    > > I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a
    nightmare
    > > situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is
    linked in the
    > > low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a
    straight
    > > NSM365.
    > >
    > > Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
    > >
    > > I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen
    it work OK
    > > with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required
    to be
    > 900MHz.
    > >
    > > On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
    > >> How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage
    perhaps
    > >> only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are
    thinking of
    > >> switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of
    interference issues.
    > >>
    > >> Thanks
    > >>
    > >> Patrick Nix, Jr.,
    > >> Computer Network Solutions
    > >> CSWEB.NET <http://CSWEB.NET> <http://CSWEB.NET> Internet Services
    > >> IT Manager
    > >>
    > >> http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
    > >> http://www.csweb.net
    > >>
    > >> (918) 235-0414 <tel:%28918%29%20235-0414>
    > >>
    > >>
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >>
    > >> Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
    confidential and
    > >> privileged information. If you are not the intended
    recipient, please
    > >> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
    e-mail and
    > >> destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
    information by a
    > >> person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and
    may be
    > illegal.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    > >> http://signup.wispa.org/
    > >>
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >>
    > >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> <mailto:wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
    > >>
    > >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    > >>
    > >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    > >
    > > --
    > > Simon Westlake
    > > si...@powercode.com <mailto:si...@powercode.com>
    <mailto:si...@powercode.com <mailto:si...@powercode.com>>
    > > (920) 351-1010 <tel:%28920%29%20351-1010>
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    > > http://signup.wispa.org/
    > >
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> <mailto:wireless@wispa.org
    <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
    > >
    > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    > >
    > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    > http://signup.wispa.org/
    >
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
    >
    > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
    >
    > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

    --
    Simon Westlake
    si...@powercode.com <mailto:si...@powercode.com>
    (920) 351-1010 <tel:%28920%29%20351-1010>



    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    http://signup.wispa.org/
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

    Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    http://signup.wispa.org/
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

    Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

    -----
    No virus found in this message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
    Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date:
    06/21/11


    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    http://signup.wispa.org/
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

    Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to