"it is Regulation (1996 Telecom Act) that
allowed us (ISP's) to be able to go into the business of providing
internet access and other communication services"
With all due respect, it's exactly the mindset that government
"allows" us to be in business that IS the problem. Telecom Act or no,
regulation or no, there should be no question that we are allowed to
make a living the way we want to regardless.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappydsl.net
<mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net>> wrote:
I am going to address your points backwards:-
--------You wrote -------
And lastly, about the FCC, the last administration's appointees were
advocates for free markets and for competition and deregulation. Not
particularly effective ones, but at least they were not our
enemy. The
current administration's people at the FCC are IN NO WAY our
friend, for
any way, manner, or purpose, and everything they want is bad for
us and
the country. STop talking political party talking points, and get
some
reality.
---------------------------------
We have been wireline ISP's first, since 2000, if you really believe
what you wrote (above) then you are truly mis-informed...
The simple facts are ... it is Regulation (1996 Telecom Act) that
allowed us (ISP's) to be able to go into the business of providing
internet access and other communication services ..... and it is THE
DEREGULATION over the past 5 years, that has been KILLING the
ISP's off.
You forget, that if you don't have the ability to connect to other
networks in a fair and equitable manner, you are not going to be
able to
continue in this business.
Get a grip of reality and the full picture.. you are playing with
a DUAL
EDGE sword here...
---------------You wrote-----------------
You seem to think that the answer is to find the right pol to
influence and
the right committee members to lobby and the right allies to
obstruct X or
advance Y, but those are expediency, not principle. They should
be TACTICS
to a principled purpose, one that will attract others, on the
basis of its
soundness and validity.
------------------------------------------------
Not sure where you are coming up with this from ...however each and
every one has his own right to interpret the events .
------------You wrote -----------------------------
Additionally, I said absolutely NOTHING partisan. Not even
ideological.
It's simple straightforward business principles. Principle
Numero Uno is
"have the freedom to be in business", and there is nothing
convoluted or
difficult about that.
----------------------------------------------------
hehe.. when you start off a paragraph with "this administration"
or do
a follow up with "the previous administration".. that is as
partisan as
one can get....
I agree with your 'Principle Numero Uno', but you are harking at the
wrong organization.. it is not in WISPA's charter or mission, maybe
should be a member of the SBA association, or FISPA or COMPTEL
... but
then again you will have to get your head straight about how the
US Gov.
has operated for the last 200 years....
WISPA's mission has been to address issues related to Wireless, (not
business, not telephone service, not hosted services, etc etc)...
While I understand your frustration with the Gov., and do agree with
some of your points, but what you keep putting forward on the WISPA
forums is more like 'Don Quixote Tilting at the windmills"
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet& Telecom
On 7/16/2011 12:59 AM, MDK wrote:
> A "plan of action"? If I said "this is what WISPA should do"
and laid it
> out in detail, all you'd do is say "who are you? Why should we
hacve to do
> what you say?"
>
> Frankly, I have no idea why you're having difficulty. You see,
when you
> have proper business principles as your guiding mechanism, what
you should
> do is crystal clear. Nobody needs to write out a plan of
action, it
> becomes self evident - you always advocate FOR the proper and
best thing.
> And, after being consistent, year after year, and when stuff
like this comes
> up, which becomes so blatantly obviously a result of failure to
follow true
> principle, again, nothing is obscure or difficult.
>
> Additionally, I said absolutely NOTHING partisan. Not even
ideological.
> It's simple straightforward business principles. Principle
Numero Uno is
> "have the freedom to be in business", and there is nothing
convoluted or
> difficult about that.
>
> You seem to be interested in mere expediency. That's what's
gotten us to
> this crisis point, the idea of managing the favoritism, the
cronyism, etc,
> to favor you, or at least not hurt you too much. That's
what's BEEN going
> on. Had we (WISPA) been looking for and actively seeking
allies who would
> with us, say with many voices, but one message - "hands off,
and be a
> steward of what's entrusted to you", I think the landscape
would look
> different. The word "steward" is loaded. It means one
entrusted to manage
> things for the benefit OF THE OWNER, that's us. The FCC and
Congress are
> managing for the benefit of the federal treasury and the
donations to
> campaigns - which is the polar opposite of managed for the good
of the
> people.
>
> In the previous post, I wrote an analogy, one where the city
effectively
> puts every service and business up for licensure at auction.
It takes no
> imagination at all to see that the city coffers and the winning
bidder are
> the beneficiaries and the people are the losers. Spectrum is
a public or
> national resource held in trust by the federal government.
Auctions to the
> highest bidder do not benefit anyone but the monopoly holder
and the
> treasury, by creating monopolies or very limited competition.
Again, we as
> consumers and businessmen are the losers. Imagine if there
were enough
> spectrum delegated so that if us WISP's wanted to be mobile
broadband
> providers we could, as well as cellular, or even video / audio
broadcasters.
> Instead, such services have been delegated a minute slice of
available
> spectrum, keeping up the price of the auctions - and the number of
> competitors down.
>
> Why? It is in the interest of politicians to separate us from
our money.
> But their REAL job is to defend us keeping it. There are NOW
myriad
> political allies to spread this message, to change the
discussion from "whom
> to screw out of lots of money" to "what is the best policy for
the people
> and keep competition alive?" And, that's the message that is
NOT being
> advocated by WISPA, and it should be.
>
> You seem to think that the answer is to find the right pol to
influence and
> the right committee members to lobby and the right allies to
obstruct X or
> advance Y, but those are expediency, not principle. They
should be TACTICS
> to a principled purpose, one that will attract others, on the
basis of its
> soundness and validity.
>
> And lastly, about the FCC, the last administration's appointees
were
> advocates for free markets and for competition and
deregulation. Not
> particularly effective ones, but at least they were not our
enemy. The
> current administration's people at the FCC are IN NO WAY our
friend, for any
> way, manner, or purpose, and everything they want is bad for us
and the
> country. STop talking political party talking points, and get
some reality.
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
> 541-969-8200 509-386-4589 <tel:509-386-4589>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Faisal Imtiaz"<fai...@snappydsl.net
<mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net>>
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 8:01 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"<wireless@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Legislative Situation Is Dire
>
>> Errr....... and your point is ?
>>
>> Ok, I am a nobody... I have seen / read your emails, not once
can I say
>> I have been able to pick out a proposed specific, action or a
plan of
>> action from you ....
>>
>> My friend you and I can agree or dis-agree on concepts all day
long...
>> but the point still remains ... I for myself still am not able to
>> ascertain what exactly is it that you have been proposing ? ( I
>> understand the anger at all of the powers to be.... part...and
I beg to
>> differ when you start blaming ..'this administration'..... I
personally
>> have been watching and following the FCC stuff, on sliding
slopes, for
>> the last 12 years..that according to my calculations has been
multiple
>> administrations.....)
>>
>> You clear your head, and try to articulate your position in a
>> non-partisan manner, which can be understood by the general
public, and
>> put forward a reasonably understandable plan of action .... I
guarantee
>> you, you will have many here who would be willing to listen
and follow
>> your lead..
>>
>> But if you continue expressing yourself in the convoluted
manner, as in
>> your email below....then there is a very high probability that
these
>> will continue to be chalked off as "tirades" and "rants".
>>
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet& Telecom
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
-RickG
