Keeping a link active versus maintaining throughput under divers conditions is two different things. For the money paid I would go with something like Alvarion. But then again, after 12 years, I would not invest big dollars in CPE or Access points. Only in the backhauls and infrastructures.
The only reason I have not went UBNT, I have found much feed back on how they deal with interference, I like Frequency Hopper (FH) they keep a decent link through the most divers environments. But how does UBNT deal with interference? Robert Canary OCDirect Electrical-Datacomm (866) 594-0786 Fax (270) 955-0362 Voice ----- Original Message ----- > The Motorola canopy is one of the best equipment I've ever used. I > have a 7 year old link that has never faltered. Upgraded the > firmware twice but that's about it. Only problems the price. Trying > UBNT because of Mikrotiks success. I usually prefer to pay for > technology rather than buying cheap and spending forever tweaking > it. > > Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe > AS Technologies Ltd > Tel. 234(0)8023258027 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
