On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:44 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote: > As far as performance is concerned which will offer the better > end result? Bonding or routing the interfaces? Can you elaborate > on how to use ospf to create dedicated tx / rx interfaces? We use > ospf currently to facilitate a self-healing network.
If you are already running OSPF, you can use this: http://blog.butchevans.com/2008/10/using-ospf-to-create-full-duplex-behaviour-for-wireless-links/ Adding a second path will add SOME bandwidth, but it will not be likely to double the throughput. Bonding, on the other hand, will double the throughput, but will not be full duplex behavior. There are examples of bonding on Mikrotik's wiki that may be of use. -- ******************************************************************** * Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! * * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ******************************************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
