You've proved you're a Ubiquiti fanboy and you're not happy with anything
else.  Just buy Ubiquiti stuff and let's end this thread going no where and
not accomplishing anything.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com>wrote:

> Oh. That's the other thing. No matter what you want to ask. They want a
> sup file.
>
> If I want to ask a question on assigning a vlan to a port. They want a sup
> file.
> Creating a user. Sup file.
>
> It's ridiculous. It's like they intentionally make support into a circus
> so people won't bother them.
>
> With Ubiquiti you just ask your question and get an answer.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 19:45, Brian Rohrbacher <br...@reliableinter.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I've contacted MT support once.  It was a week ago.  I had an old 532
> > running 3.x and it wouldn't upgrade.  I went to the website, filled out
> > the form, attached the sup file and sent it.  I got a reply five minutes
> > later with a new key.  I upgraded.  Life is good.  :)
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > On 1/9/2013 5:15 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:04:18PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >>> I've been using both MT and UBNT for many many years and I plan to
> >>> use them both for many years. MT support has been almost completely
> >>> absent, while UBNT typically answers fairly quickly. That said,
> >>> usually when I notice a problem with my MT product, it's already been
> >>> fixed in a newer release.
> >> MT support in their forum is hit and miss.  I get timely responses
> >> from supp...@mikrotik.com.  I don't understand the people who
> >> complain on the forums that MT support is horrible and refuse to
> >> e-mail supp...@mikrotik.com.  I am not saying that Mike is one of
> >> those guys.  I don't know if his statement is based on experience
> >> with supp...@mikrotik.com or not.
> >>
> >> The east europe/western asia folks just seem to have a bit of a
> >> different take on things than we in North America do.  I think
> >> that's just due to the culture and language differences.  They tend
> >> to come off as being a bit brusk to us.
> >>
> >> I don't trust any newly shipping product in a production environment.
> >> They go into designated test environments.  The Edge Router may be
> >> the best thing since sliced bread.  However, the devices I've used
> >> the Quagga stack on have let me down more than the MikroTik routing
> >> stack.  Of course, most of those Quagga devices were StarOS which
> >> had its own problems.  Thankfully, we have completed our 100% StarOS
> >> to 100% UBNT AP/backhaul radios with MikroTik routers transition.
> >>
> >> When I get an Edge Router, I will play with it on the desk.  Then
> >> it will be put a nearby but small tower site.  If it behaves, I'll
> >> put one on a non-leaf node tower.  I'm not in a hurry to get my
> >> first EdgeRouter.
> >>
> >> Until then, I really like my 493Gs running 5.21.  We have not run
> >> any production MikroTik wireless gear.  We just haven't.  We picked
> >> up some Ubiquiti gear first.  No other reason.
> >>
> >> I have 6.0rc6 on the MikroTik in the house.  It has wireless.  It
> >> works for my personal devices.  I wouldn't consider using RouterOS
> >> 6 on customer use gear, yet.  Not even when they are calling it the
> >> 6th release candidate.  It's not a release candidate if you are
> >> still adding new features.  If you are still adding new features,
> >> it is an alpha release...
> >>
> >> I have a couple of RB2011UAS units on the bench.  They aren't in
> >> the field for the same reason I would not rush to put the EdgeRouter
> >> in the field.
> >>
> >> UBNT and MikroTik both have software QA issues.  At this price
> >> point, we get to be the alpha/beta testers.  C'est la vie.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to