No. Nor do I have Cisco iOS running on my own hardware. 

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 9, 2013, at 18:35, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

> You have AirOS or that router software on your own x86 hardware?
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> On Jan 9, 2013 6:30 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> wrote:
>> Oh. It's that license thing again. Another reason I don't like MikroTik. 
>> With Uniquiti there are no license levels. You get what you purchased. 
>> 
>> On Jan 9, 2013, at 18:11, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Because a bunch of people run cracked copies...
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>> On Jan 9, 2013 6:03 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> wrote:
>>>> supp...@mikrotik.com?  Yes. You usually get a reply there. Asking you to 
>>>> supply your serial number.  As if I'd ask for support for a product I 
>>>> don't own.
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 9, 2013, at 17:15, Scott Lambert <lamb...@lambertfam.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:04:18PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>> >> I've been using both MT and UBNT for many many years and I plan to
>>>> >> use them both for many years. MT support has been almost completely
>>>> >> absent, while UBNT typically answers fairly quickly. That said,
>>>> >> usually when I notice a problem with my MT product, it's already been
>>>> >> fixed in a newer release.
>>>> >
>>>> > MT support in their forum is hit and miss.  I get timely responses
>>>> > from supp...@mikrotik.com.  I don't understand the people who
>>>> > complain on the forums that MT support is horrible and refuse to
>>>> > e-mail supp...@mikrotik.com.  I am not saying that Mike is one of
>>>> > those guys.  I don't know if his statement is based on experience
>>>> > with supp...@mikrotik.com or not.
>>>> >
>>>> > The east europe/western asia folks just seem to have a bit of a
>>>> > different take on things than we in North America do.  I think
>>>> > that's just due to the culture and language differences.  They tend
>>>> > to come off as being a bit brusk to us.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't trust any newly shipping product in a production environment.
>>>> > They go into designated test environments.  The Edge Router may be
>>>> > the best thing since sliced bread.  However, the devices I've used
>>>> > the Quagga stack on have let me down more than the MikroTik routing
>>>> > stack.  Of course, most of those Quagga devices were StarOS which
>>>> > had its own problems.  Thankfully, we have completed our 100% StarOS
>>>> > to 100% UBNT AP/backhaul radios with MikroTik routers transition.
>>>> >
>>>> > When I get an Edge Router, I will play with it on the desk.  Then
>>>> > it will be put a nearby but small tower site.  If it behaves, I'll
>>>> > put one on a non-leaf node tower.  I'm not in a hurry to get my
>>>> > first EdgeRouter.
>>>> >
>>>> > Until then, I really like my 493Gs running 5.21.  We have not run
>>>> > any production MikroTik wireless gear.  We just haven't.  We picked
>>>> > up some Ubiquiti gear first.  No other reason.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have 6.0rc6 on the MikroTik in the house.  It has wireless.  It
>>>> > works for my personal devices.  I wouldn't consider using RouterOS
>>>> > 6 on customer use gear, yet.  Not even when they are calling it the
>>>> > 6th release candidate.  It's not a release candidate if you are
>>>> > still adding new features.  If you are still adding new features,
>>>> > it is an alpha release...
>>>> >
>>>> > I have a couple of RB2011UAS units on the bench.  They aren't in
>>>> > the field for the same reason I would not rush to put the EdgeRouter
>>>> > in the field.
>>>> >
>>>> > UBNT and MikroTik both have software QA issues.  At this price
>>>> > point, we get to be the alpha/beta testers.  C'est la vie.
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Scott Lambert                    KC5MLE                       Unix 
>>>> > SysAdmin
>>>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Wireless mailing list
>>>> > Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to