Yeah, I had heard canopy/cambium was doing other stuff. What are the other companies using though?

*Josh Reynolds*
Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS
j...@spitwspots.com | www.spitwspots.com

On 03/27/2014 11:42 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

Wimax on the pmp320 and others is 3.65

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mar 27, 2014 2:36 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote:

    Different frequencies (2.5 in the US, 2.3 in Asia, 3.3 and 3.5GHz
    in other areas)
    5bps/Hz vs 2.7bps/Hz on 802.11-stuff
    smart antenna systems
    on the fly bandwidth and channel changes
    channel bandwidths of things like 1.25MHz - 20MHz
    hybrid automatic repeat-request (HARQ -
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_automatic_repeat-request)
    etc.

    It's a different animal. It's very expensive though, and I've
    heard some pretty outrageous claims from it that I just don't believe.


    *Josh Reynolds*
    Chief Information Officer
    SPITwSPOTS
    j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> |
    www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>

    On 03/27/2014 11:25 AM, Sam wrote:
    Today we had a company come to us pushing wimax. Admittedly I've never
    used wimax, nor do I know a lot about it. From what I can see looking at
    Google images of the technology and how it's deployed, it looks no
    different than the PtP and PtMP that we all use with 900 MHz, or 2.4 and
    5.x GHz.

    Is the only advantage to wimax the presumably clearer and less-used
    frequencies upon which they operate? I had (evidently mistakenly)
    thought that perhaps wimax was a code word for some sort of mesh, and
    that's how it achieved NLOS service. However in looking at the network
    layouts on Google, it doesn't look like that at all. Rather, it looks
    like that add another AP to get around the obstruction(s), and simply
    backhaul it to an intermediary AP/tower to get it back to the PoP.

    Thanks
    Sam

    _______________________________________________
    Wireless mailing list
    Wireless@wispa.org  <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


    _______________________________________________
    Wireless mailing list
    Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to