Purewave also falls under "whatever their name is now" ... On Mar 27, 2014 5:13 PM, "Mike Hammett" <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> PureWave, RunCom, Alvarion (well, whatever their name is now), the > Aperto\Tranzeo guys, AirSpan was the first for the full 50 MHz, etc. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> > *To: *wireless@wispa.org > *Sent: *Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:51:51 PM > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Help Me Understand This WiMax Show We Had... > > Yeah, I had heard canopy/cambium was doing other stuff. What are the other > companies using though? > > *Josh Reynolds* > Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS > j...@spitwspots.com | www.spitwspots.com > On 03/27/2014 11:42 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Wimax on the pmp320 and others is 3.65 > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 27, 2014 2:36 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > >> Different frequencies (2.5 in the US, 2.3 in Asia, 3.3 and 3.5GHz in >> other areas) >> 5bps/Hz vs 2.7bps/Hz on 802.11-stuff >> smart antenna systems >> on the fly bandwidth and channel changes >> channel bandwidths of things like 1.25MHz - 20MHz >> hybrid automatic repeat-request (HARQ - >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_automatic_repeat-request) >> etc. >> >> It's a different animal. It's very expensive though, and I've heard some >> pretty outrageous claims from it that I just don't believe. >> >> >> *Josh Reynolds* >> Chief Information Officer >> SPITwSPOTS >> j...@spitwspots.com | www.spitwspots.com >> On 03/27/2014 11:25 AM, Sam wrote: >> >> Today we had a company come to us pushing wimax. Admittedly I've never >> used wimax, nor do I know a lot about it. From what I can see looking at >> Google images of the technology and how it's deployed, it looks no >> different than the PtP and PtMP that we all use with 900 MHz, or 2.4 and >> 5.x GHz. >> >> Is the only advantage to wimax the presumably clearer and less-used >> frequencies upon which they operate? I had (evidently mistakenly) >> thought that perhaps wimax was a code word for some sort of mesh, and >> that's how it achieved NLOS service. However in looking at the network >> layouts on Google, it doesn't look like that at all. Rather, it looks >> like that add another AP to get around the obstruction(s), and simply >> backhaul it to an intermediary AP/tower to get it back to the PoP. >> >> Thanks >> Sam >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing >> listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing > listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
