Higher one way throughput. 
More channels to choose from. 
DFS hit doesn't take your link down. 
External antennas. 
Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things that vary 
like X-pol and F/B. 
Lower power consumption. 
Standard PoE. 
Etc. 





----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> 
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 

THanks Josh! 
I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light? 

H/V instead of cross-slant antennas. 
Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber. 
And latency is higher than an airFiber 

What's the "amazing" thing about this new device? 

On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiPOTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> submit comments for approval / additions please 
> 
> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart, and some of 
> it I'm lazy on. 
> 
> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal / channel 
> width table 
> 
> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any results of an 
> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive). 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to