I totally understand, Steve. What I'm saying is now you have folks throwing up 5GHz 40MHz backhauls.... ewwwww. I guess we'll say. It's nice the options are out there, but I wish they could be saved for use in the hands of WISPs only.
On 8/6/14, 2:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: > Matt, nausea can be fixed with realism. I have used nothing but 5GHz > backhauls for 8 years. Only in the last 2 years have we gone to any 5 GHz > Client other than business. I have 15 towers and each has at least 2 paths > in and out for redundancy. So that is 35+ Links. Most are 5 miles or more > so not an AF24 candidate in my rain zone. I can't afford to just go out and > buy $175,000 worth of licensed backhauls. But for the price of one Licensed > link I can buy 2.5- 5GHz links (AF5, Mimosa, or whoever) saving me $100,000 > when all is said and done. > > Would I prefer to do all licensed and save all the 5GHz for Customer? Heck > Yes!! But that is not the reality I live in. > > Steve Barnes > General Manager > PCSWIN.com > Howard LLC. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Matt Hoppes > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:03 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) > > I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous. > > > > On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> Higher one way throughput. >> More channels to choose from. >> DFS hit doesn't take your link down. >> External antennas. >> Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things >> that vary like X-pol and F/B. >> Lower power consumption. >> Standard PoE. >> Etc. >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentC >> omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent- >> computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) >> >> THanks Josh! >> I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light? >> >> H/V instead of cross-slant antennas. >> Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber. >> And latency is higher than an airFiber >> >> What's the "amazing" thing about this new device? >> >> On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiP >> OTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> submit comments for approval / additions please >>> >>> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart, and some >>> of it I'm lazy on. >>> >>> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal / >>> channel width table >>> >>> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any results of >>> an >>> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive). >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
