Unfortunately the manufacturer who seems to miss crucial parts or ship
me the wrong units (if they ship to the correct location) on a
consistent basis is frequently late as well. So I stick tend to stick
with UBNT for UBNT applications.
On 8/28/2014 2:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
That is of course assuming that you don't get it the day you need it. ;-)
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Randy Cosby" <[email protected]>
*To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
*Sent: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:30:43 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Just open up all boxes and check all your parts before you go out.
Nuts. Brackets. Cables.
I've never had a problem with missing parts on UBNT sectors.
On 8/28/2014 2:07 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Not only should you have spares, you should also make sure you
have the right parts before you go to the job...
even if you do have the right parts, it's still a nuisance to deal
with getting sent the wrong stuff... it can happen with anything
though - for instance, I once got sent a 5ghz UBNT omni instead of
2.4ghz... I'm pretty sure I would've been better off with the
wrong pigtails ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Jim Patient [[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:01 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
If you get out to the job and don't have the right pigtail because
the vendor didn't ship the right one, it's not the vendors fault.
You should have several spares of every flavor in your truck. If
not, it's a safe bet Murphy will show up throwing his laws around :-)
Jim Patient
Office: 314-735-0270
linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/>
towercoverage.com <http://www.towercoverage.com/>
ispradio.com <http://www.ispradio.com/>
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:30 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by
mistake... =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Matt Brendle
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
KPP if for nothing else it comes with better jumpers. KPP has N
connectors on antenna and jumper to match up to RP-SMA on Rocket.
YMMV
-Matt
*From:*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:23 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Same radios but I had the opposite experience. I had one at -35,
maybe the RF armor requires both of those dumb machine screws to work.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Greg Osborn
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
UBNT to KPP straight up, kpp. UBNT with armor vs KPP, we
prefer UBNT
because of the extra horizontal separation required with KPP.
On a grainleg
platform, we've seen kpp sectors see one another at -30 or
below, where UBNT
see one another in the -50's. On a tower without standoffs and
KPP, forget
it, you will have problems.
2.4 in 10mhz cw.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
one obvious advantage with the KPP is that the connectors or
all covered by
the shielding, so you eliminate any potential issues with
water in the
connectors, and you can throw away that annoying cover on the
Rocket over
the ethernet port.
________________________________________
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of
Sam [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets.
I was wondering about the shielding as well. Unless you're in
an area with a
ton of interference... But as was mentioned, the KP omni with
the shielding
is the same price basically as the same UBNT model without it.
I'm all about
using stuff that's included at no additional charge :)
On 8/28/2014 10:00, Mathew Howard wrote:
> I haven't used any KPP omnis, but I have used several
different brands of
dual polarity omnis and I haven't really seen any notable
difference in
performance between any of them.
>
> Are you looking at 2.4ghz or 5ghz?
>
> Is there really a lot of benefit to shielding the radio with
an omni? it
seems somewhat pointless to me...
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] on
> behalf of Sam [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
>
> That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in
> performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible?
>
> Thanks
> Sam
>
>
>
> On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote:
>> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with
a cover
>> for the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if
you're
>> using stock Rockets with stock UBNT antennas.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]
>> On Behalf Of Sam
>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
>>
>> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP
Performance
>> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their
>> experiences of one vs the other. For this project I'm
specifically
>> looking at 13 dBi omni antennas, but am curious about how
the sector
>> antennas compare as well.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sam
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
signature
<http://www.infowest.com/> Randy Cosby
InfoWest, Inc
435-674-0165 x 2010
infowest.com <http://www.infowest.com/>
This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc
and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information.
Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
[email protected] by reply email and destroy
the original message, all attachments and copies.
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
signature
<http://www.infowest.com/> Randy Cosby
InfoWest, Inc
435-674-0165 x 2010
infowest.com <http://www.infowest.com/>
This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc
and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information.
Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
[email protected] by reply email and destroy
the original message, all attachments and copies.
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
