That is of course assuming that you don't get it the day you need it. ;-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Cosby" <[email protected]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:30:43 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Just open up all boxes and check all your parts before you go out. Nuts. Brackets. Cables. I've never had a problem with missing parts on UBNT sectors. On 8/28/2014 2:07 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Not only should you have spares, you should also make sure you have the right parts before you go to the job... even if you do have the right parts, it's still a nuisance to deal with getting sent the wrong stuff... it can happen with anything though - for instance, I once got sent a 5ghz UBNT omni instead of 2.4ghz... I'm pretty sure I would've been better off with the wrong pigtails ;-) From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf of Jim Patient [ [email protected] ] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:01 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas If you get out to the job and don't have the right pigtail because the vendor didn't ship the right one, it's not the vendors fault. You should have several spares of every flavor in your truck. If not, it's a safe bet Murphy will show up throwing his laws around :-) Jim Patient Office: 314-735-0270 linktechs.net towercoverage.com ispradio.com From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:30 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by mistake... =P Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Matt Brendle < [email protected] > wrote: KPP if for nothing else it comes with better jumpers. KPP has N connectors on antenna and jumper to match up to RP-SMA on Rocket. YMMV -Matt From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:23 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Same radios but I had the opposite experience. I had one at -35, maybe the RF armor requires both of those dumb machine screws to work. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Greg Osborn < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> UBNT to KPP straight up, kpp. UBNT with armor vs KPP, we prefer UBNT because of the extra horizontal separation required with KPP. On a grainleg platform, we've seen kpp sectors see one another at -30 or below, where UBNT see one another in the -50's. On a tower without standoffs and KPP, forget it, you will have problems. 2.4 in 10mhz cw. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:33 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas one obvious advantage with the KPP is that the connectors or all covered by the shielding, so you eliminate any potential issues with water in the connectors, and you can throw away that annoying cover on the Rocket over the ethernet port. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf of Sam [ [email protected] ] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets. I was wondering about the shielding as well. Unless you're in an area with a ton of interference... But as was mentioned, the KP omni with the shielding is the same price basically as the same UBNT model without it. I'm all about using stuff that's included at no additional charge :) On 8/28/2014 10:00, Mathew Howard wrote: > I haven't used any KPP omnis, but I have used several different brands of dual polarity omnis and I haven't really seen any notable difference in performance between any of them. > > Are you looking at 2.4ghz or 5ghz? > > Is there really a lot of benefit to shielding the radio with an omni? it seems somewhat pointless to me... > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on > behalf of Sam [ [email protected] ] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas > > That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in > performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible? > > Thanks > Sam > > > > On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote: >> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover >> for the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're >> using stock Rockets with stock UBNT antennas. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] >> On Behalf Of Sam >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas >> >> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP Performance >> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their >> experiences of one vs the other. For this project I'm specifically >> looking at 13 dBi omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector >> antennas compare as well. >> >> Thanks >> Sam >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless </blockquote> -- signature Randy Cosby InfoWest, Inc 435-674-0165 x 2010 infowest.com This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact [email protected] by reply email and destroy the original message, all attachments and copies. _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
