No such issues here with more then 100 deployed. Actually have to include that yesterday we replaced a NanoBridge M2 with a NanoBeam M2 and solved a major issue on a tower. The tower, which is a little crowded with mostly PowerBridges and AirFibers... had three M2 radios, a Rocket Dish, NanoBridge, and NanoBeam. We replaced those three with a 60 degree Titanium sector with standard rocket M2... which helped the interference issue, but did not solve it. So we replaced the three down stream NanoBridges with NanoBeams and now all is good. Went from signals in of high 70s and low 80s with CCQs as low as 50... to signals in from 68-72 and CCQs 90-99.
But most of my guys have not being using the template for this model, but upgrading and programming on site. Something we are changing... a staff person assigned to load our templates on radios before install techs grab them out of storage. As an old, old programmer, I would highly suggest following the advice above and have template configs by model and OS version. Sometimes in programming and design, you have no choice but to make a change in a file structure that breaks loading a previous version (template for example) of anything. Assume that with any OS release, that you need a new template. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Greg Osborn <[email protected]> wrote: > I had it happen the other day. Fresh install, told tech, “hold on, I need > to update fw” 5 minutes later it hadn’t come back. Reboot didn’t work. > Couldn’t access from our 192.168.100.1 address or the default. Had to hard > reset. It did however, take the upgrade. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:11 PM > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems > > > > That doesn't seem possible... > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:09 PM, timothy steele <[email protected]> > wrote: > > A nano beam had 5.5.6 on it? That seems strange > > — > Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > To 5.5.9 no. Are you using the XW? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sep 16, 2014 3:00 PM, "Bryce Duchcherer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone else having problems with nanobeams crashing after a firmware > update? > > It’s starting to be a common occurrence for us. > > > > Bryce D > > NETAGO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- -- Clay Stewart, CEO SCS Broadband 434.263.6363 O 434.942.6510 C [email protected] “We Keep You Up and Running” Please send sales inquiries to [email protected] Please send service/repair requests to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
