On 1/12/2017 9:53 AM, Henry N. Chappell II wrote: > Josh, > > No, the NEPA & SHPO is required in all states for all new structures > with licensed and unlicensed equipment.
Henry, we have been told by the FCC that it's not required if the structure will hold only unlicensed equipment. I have a query into them regarding the lightly-licensed (3.65) radios, but it takes a while to hear back from them. I posted here hoping to expedite my question somewhat. :) > -------- Original message -------- > From: Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > Date: 1/12/17 9:42 AM (GMT-06:00) > To: WISPA General List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] NEPA/SHPA Requirement > > This seems to be only required in certain areas, correct? Mainly on or > near areas of historical or religious significance? > > On Jan 12, 2017 9:35 AM, "Sam Morris" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > (Sorry... SHPO, not SHPA) > > National Environmental Policy Act, and State Historical Preservation > Office. I'm not a lawyer, and I didn't sleep in a Holiday Inn Express > last night, but the way I understand it, they are legal requirements > pertaining to new structures that are going to hold radio equipment that > uses licensed (or lightly-licensed?) frequencies, and makes a > requirements to go through a certification process from these two > offices. NEPA > (https://www.epa.gov/nepa/national-environmental-policy-act-review-process > > <https://www.epa.gov/nepa/national-environmental-policy-act-review-process>) > is an EPA requirement, and SHPO, > (https://www.nps.gov/Nr/shpolist.htm > <https://www.nps.gov/Nr/shpolist.htm>) > as it has pertained to us, is primarily native-Americans inspecting the > site and certifying that you're not desecrating sacred ground. > > I know it's a requirements if the structure holds 11 Ghz, 220 Mhz, 6 > Ghz, etc. I don't know if it is also a requirements if it's the 3.65 > type of license, hence my question. :) > > Thanks > Sam > > On 1/12/2017 8:40 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > NEPA/SHPA? Educate me pls > > > > On Jan 12, 2017 7:05 AM, "Sam Morris" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Good Morning, > > > > It's my understanding that if a new structure that will hold only > > non-licensed equipment is built, that NEPA/SHPA certification > isn't > > required. What about 3.65 equipment? Since it's "lightly > licensed", > > where would a new structure (where 3.65 equipment will > reside) fall with > > regards to the NEPA/SHPA requirement? > > > > Thanks! > > Sam > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireless mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless> > > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireless mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
