I would rather have more unlicensed spectrum. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 2, 2017 5:13 PM, "Mark Radabaugh" <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > WISPA has been asked to participate in a wireless industry push to explore > unlicensed use in the current Part 101 6Ghz spectrum. The idea is to > increase the current Part 15 allowed power limits and to bring in UNII > rules, along with additional mitigations currently under study (e.g., > sensing, database) to protect incumbents. As there are no federal users > (other than PTP) this would not require the ESC system of CBRS and is > potentially considerably simpler to implement. > > The upside is significantly more spectrum availability in a high > power/capacity/range band. The downside is some potential loss of > geographic exclusivity and availability of new 6GHz Part 101 PTP links in > exchange for greater reliance on the use of spectrum sharing mechanisms > over time. > > I’m interested in opinions on how important 6Ghz PTP links are to the > membership and for those who use them if there would be significant > opposition to using the spectrum for Point to Multipoint. > > Mark > > Mark Radabaugh > WISPA FCC Committee Chair > 419-261-5996 <(419)%20261-5996> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
