You have my vote of yes, proceed with cautious optimism.... 

Hopefully others will chime in with their thoughts as well. 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Mark Radabaugh" <m...@amplex.net>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:52:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part
> 101 spectrum

> Faisel,

> Thanks for the input. An industry group (who wishes to remain anonymous at 
> this
> point) approached WISPA to see if we would be an opponent of this proposal
> since we are essentially the incumbents in the 6Ghz Part 101 space, or a
> supporter.

> My thought is that we have far more to gain from supporting the (admittedly
> incomplete) proposal by obtaining far more PTMP spectrum than we lose. I would
> like to respond on behalf of WISPA with enthusiastic support for the idea but 
> I
> want to get a feel from the membership before endorsing the concept.

> Mark

>> On Jun 3, 2017, at 5:19 AM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net > wrote:
>> This can be rather interesting....

>> My personal opinion is that the current part 101 is very 'wasteful' of 
>> spectrum,
>> due to how the links are coordinated, while it is completely understandable
>> that the part 101 rules favor the license holder in protecting their links.

>> I would be very much interested in knowing the exact functioning on the
>> mechanism to protect the current PTP license holder. The ability to use the
>> rest of un-used spectrum for PTMP at such sites would be very much welcomed
>> relief for severely disadvantaged areas such as South Florida, (no 3.65 due 
>> to
>> earth stations, no extended 5x due to coastal radar etc etc)..

>> Regards.

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Mark Radabaugh" < m...@amplex.net >
>>> To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org >
>>> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 6:01:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz 
>>> Part
>>> 101 spectrum

>>> There is 1325 Mhz of spectrum potentially available between 5925 to 7250Mhz.
>>> Existing 6GHz PTP links would need to be protected, as well as satellite 
>>> links,
>>> and some federal users.

>>> Mark

>>>> On Jun 2, 2017, at 5:23 PM, Mike Hammett < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> I can't imagine there's enough spectrum to do this.

>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions

>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange

>>>> The Brothers WISP

>>>> From: "Mark Radabaugh" < m...@amplex.net >
>>>> To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org >
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:12:45 PM
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 
>>>> 101
>>>> spectrum

>>>> WISPA has been asked to participate in a wireless industry push to explore
>>>> unlicensed use in the current Part 101 6Ghz spectrum. The idea is to 
>>>> increase
>>>> the current Part 15 allowed power limits and to bring in UNII rules, along 
>>>> with
>>>> additional mitigations currently under study (e.g., sensing, database) to
>>>> protect incumbents. As there are no federal users (other than PTP) this 
>>>> would
>>>> not require the ESC system of CBRS and is potentially considerably simpler 
>>>> to
>>>> implement.

>>>> The upside is significantly more spectrum availability in a high
>>>> power/capacity/range band. The downside is some potential loss of 
>>>> geographic
>>>> exclusivity and availability of new 6GHz Part 101 PTP links in exchange for
>>>> greater reliance on the use of spectrum sharing mechanisms over time.

>>>> I’m interested in opinions on how important 6Ghz PTP links are to the 
>>>> membership
>>>> and for those who use them if there would be significant opposition to 
>>>> using
>>>> the spectrum for Point to Multipoint.

>>>> Mark

>>>> Mark Radabaugh
>>>> WISPA FCC Committee Chair
>>>> 419-261-5996

>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to