On 6/5/17 4:04 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: > > It’s curious that you would give up access to potentially >1000Mhz of > clean mid-band spectrum because you don’t want your competitors using > it. Given the current limited amount of spectrum available for PTMP > use how do you propose to serve the demands of your customers without > obtaining additional spectrum? >
Smaller sites closer to your customers. > You said “all licensed PTP links would be at risk”. I don’t believe > that is the case here - we are only discussing 6Ghz which is largely > used (in our industry) for long range legacy PTP links. It’s certainly > important where it’s used at Mike Meluskey pointed out, but looking at > the numbers the band shows pretty light usage. If you take away one licensed band it could set a precedent to take more. I think this proposal is too short sighted to say that nobody uses it or that it's legacy. It's used. I just talked with a WISP about a potential 26 mile link and that's territory for considering 6GHz. I ask the parties that support killing 6GHz with unlicensed use: what replaces it? ~Seth _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
