What are you proposing replace unlicensed spectrum with? CBRS? I don’t think you are going to like the results. Straight up licensed auctions? Do you really have the money to compete with the big 4 in that?
I’m not sure what WISPA is supposed to do for you here. You don’t like Part 15, you don’t like NN. What exactly is it you want that is obtainable given the value of the spectrum? Handing it over for exclusive use of fixed wireless, and only for you is a non-starter. WISPA is trying to help you but it’s pretty hard when you don’t want unlicensed, lightly licensed, and licensed spectrum sells for billions for tiny slices. Mark > On Jun 5, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > > On 6/5/17 09:10, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: >> Another "lightly licensed" MAY work. But just another extension of >> part-15 would be a cluster f*ck. > > > Lightly licensed NN was a joke and should not be repeated. > > ~Seth > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
