If not lightly licensed, keep it the way it is.
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 11:23, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > > What are you proposing replace unlicensed spectrum with? > > CBRS? I don’t think you are going to like the results. Straight up > licensed auctions? Do you really have the money to compete with the big 4 > in that? > > I’m not sure what WISPA is supposed to do for you here. You don’t like Part > 15, you don’t like NN. > > What exactly is it you want that is obtainable given the value of the > spectrum? Handing it over for exclusive use of fixed wireless, and only for > you is a non-starter. > > WISPA is trying to help you but it’s pretty hard when you don’t want > unlicensed, lightly licensed, and licensed spectrum sells for billions for > tiny slices. > > Mark > > >> On Jun 5, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: >> >> On 6/5/17 09:10, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Another "lightly licensed" MAY work. But just another extension of >>> part-15 would be a cluster f*ck. >> >> >> Lightly licensed NN was a joke and should not be repeated. >> >> ~Seth >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
