Mark,

Can you please explain this position, specifically the arguments against the 
Title II classification?

Thanks
Mark


----- On Jul 6, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Mark Radabaugh [email protected] wrote:

> I would prefer not to see members signing onto the EFF letter. The EFF 
> position
> is contrary to the positions that WISPA has taken on Network Neutrality and
> Title II both at the board and committee levels.
> 
> WISPA continues to support the principals of network neutrality and an open
> Internet but believe this can best be achieved without the overhead of Title 
> II
> and the regulatory uncertainty that comes with Title II.
> 
> 
> Mark Radabaugh
> WISPA FCC Committee Chair
> [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ]
> 419-261-5996
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 7:52 PM, mike.lyon--- via WISP < [ mailto:[email protected] |
> [email protected] ] > wrote:
> 
> Forwarded on from another mailing list.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Erica Portnoy < [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] >
> Date: July 5, 2017 at 15:59:37 PDT
> To: [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ]
> Subject: Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net neutrality proposal
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> As many of you know, the FCC is currently engaging in the process of
> repealing its network neutrality rules and eliminating its Title II
> authority over broadband providers.
> 
> I'm writing you today to ask you to sign on to a letter that EFF has
> prepared for filing, which explains several key engineering concepts
> that are vital to understanding how the Internet actually operates given
> that the FCC's own findings misinterpret how the Internet works.
> 
> The letter stays away from legal arguments, and instead focuses on
> technical statements on the design and operation of the Internet. It is
> meant to establish a factual record for the FCC about the Internet and
> it is necessary because its initial findings in its Notice of Proposed
> Rulemaking
> < [ https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-344614A1.pdf |
> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-344614A1.pdf ] > are
> just wrong. For one, the FCC thinks that broadband Internet providers
> are the ones providing end users with the services of the entire
> Internet, from search engines to online newspapers to language
> translation tools.
> 
> /*If you're willing to sign on and help, please email
> [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ]
> (off-list) by Friday, July 14 */and I will
> be happy to share a copy of the letter for you to review before you
> agree to sign on.
> 
> The more signatures we can get, the more likely the FCC is to take
> notice as well as the courts should they move forward. All it takes is
> an email. Please help us make sure the FCC gets the facts from an
> engineer's standpoint.
> 
> Thank you for your support,
> 
> Erica Portnoy
> Staff Technologist
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> WISP mailing list
> [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wisp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to