https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15473
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Maynard <christopher.mayn...@igt.com> ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #3)
> A possibly better solution in this case would be to check if num_reg is 0,
> in which case to set it to the value of the byte count in the response
> packet. In this case, it's possible Wireshark might attempt to dissect up
> to 7 additional bits that are not valid, but it seems like a better solution
> than the current situation.
Clarification: "... in which case to set it to the value of the byte count in
the response packet multiplied by 8."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
