https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15473
--- Comment #5 from bugzi...@graglia.fr ---
>so at least for this case, it seems OK, no?
yes 1st pcap, the one with 2 frames, is ok for me.
>I think you meant to say, "The other pcap does not include the *request*"
absolutely! sorry for the error
> "... in which case to set it to the value of the byte count in the response
> packet multiplied by 8.
yes, that what I was thinking (and expected). byte_count=63 in unique frame of
second pcap -> try to dissect 63 * 8 bytes = 504.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
