> Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote: > > > Alejandro I think your proposed plugin looks realy good and > something we > > would have use for. > > From the recent mails I'm a bit confused to where we stand > on this. I > > think Guy had some comments > > on the implementation, is that beeing worked on or is further > > discussions needed? > > I have a version that builds on OS X (not as a plugin) > without doing any > type-casting of function pointers. > > I couldn't test it with one capture, though, as it appears to expect > that the RTP packets carrying the voice part of the call (as > opposed to > the signaling part of the call) are part of the call as > displayed by the > graph of the call - but that's not the case with the H.323 > call in the > capture. Is the intent that voice packets be part of the > call, or not?
Guy, are you awaiting an answer from Alejandro? What prevents the inclusion (or enablement) of listen_rtp now that we have just passed a Wireshark release? Thanks, Olivier. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
