Guy Harris wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
>> Heres the first version of the NFS anonymizer as a tshark tap.
>>
>> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~shehjart/patches/nfs_anonymizer_tap.diff

> Wireshark doesn't support overwriting the contents of a tvbuff; it's  
> read-only, and there are parts of Wireshark that expect it not to be  
> modified.  You *might* be able to get away with it in TShark.

TShark is what I need.

> Furthermore, even if you do cheat by converting the "const char *"  
> that "tvb_get_ptr()" returns into a "char *", and then overwrite what  
> the "char *" points to, all you're doing is overwriting an in-memory  
> buffer - that would "anonymize" in the sense of not displaying the  
> actual value of the field, but if you try to save the file, the  
> resulting file won't be anonymized.  If all you're doing is taking a  
> capture and dissecting it with TShark, and just want the dissection to  
> be anonymized, that might be sufficient.

I haven't tested it with wireshark since I do not need a GUI
anonymizer, so yes, it might not work if I save the file from wireshark.

It does work in TShark but only when the output is being dumped to file 
using -w option. The display on stdout is not the anonymized data but 
I'd like to determine if I can do something to fix that later.


>       1) I don't know what type of benchmarking you're doing, but if it  
> involves knowing what's being done to specific files, a fancier  
> anonymizer could build a table mapping "real" file names to  
> "anonymized" file names, so that all references to a file name "foo"  
> would be mapped to the same anonymized name;

Yes, thats being done already. For reference, see the use of:
        /* Filename to Anonymized filename map */
        static GHashTable *fname2afname_map = NULL;

        /* File handle to anonymized file handle map */
        static GHashTable *fh2afh_map = NULL;

>       2) nothing about this code restricts it to pcap files - nothing in  
> Wireshark/TShark above the wiretap level knows or cares what the file  
> format is, they just see the packet data;

Didnt know that. Will keep in mind.

Thanks
Shehjar
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to