thanks graham,it worked for me.its compiling successfully thanks ankur
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com>wrote: > On 27/04/2010 05:38, ankur madan wrote: > > So,is there any other solution for this problem.due to some reason i have 2 > work on VS 2005 only.looking forward for a response. > > There are three main issues you will face when trying to compile Wireshark > with VS2005: > > 1) The makefiles and sources attempt to conditionally compile code based > on the compiler version. IMHO this is wrong and it should be based on the > SDK in use. After all, you can use the latest (Win7) SDK with VS2005. > These are mainly around the area of file dialogs, and IPV6 definitions. > > 2) Compiler behavioural differences, this leads to odd errors with > compilation like the one you ran into > > 3) Some 3rd party libraries are linked with c run-times that are later > than those supplied with VS2005 (Lua). This means that the code will > compile and link but at runtime an error will be generated. The solution > here is to specify earlier versions of the library (5.1 for Lua) in > config.nmake. > > I don't know if some of these issues have been solved and I only carry the > changes in my local working copy for historical purposes, but they allow me > to build a working Wireshark with VS2005 (obviously I don't see any 802.15.4 > frames). > > I don't have the time to push these changes upstream (particularly the > changes to use the SDK version not the compiler as they are extensive), > especially as VS2005 is now 2 versions off the latest compilers. I can > attach a patch that includes all my changes if you wish. > > -- > Regards, > > Graham Bloice > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe