thanks graham,it worked for me.its compiling successfully

thanks
ankur

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Graham Bloice
<graham.blo...@trihedral.com>wrote:

>  On 27/04/2010 05:38, ankur madan wrote:
>
> So,is there any other solution for this problem.due to some reason i have 2
> work on VS 2005 only.looking forward for a response.
>
> There are three main issues you will face when trying to compile Wireshark
> with VS2005:
>
> 1)  The makefiles and sources attempt to conditionally compile code based
> on the compiler version.  IMHO this is wrong and it should be based on the
> SDK in use.  After all, you can use the latest (Win7) SDK with VS2005.
> These are mainly around the area of file dialogs, and IPV6 definitions.
>
> 2) Compiler behavioural differences, this leads to odd errors with
> compilation like the one you ran into
>
> 3)  Some 3rd party libraries are linked with c run-times that are later
> than those supplied with VS2005 (Lua).  This means that the code will
> compile and link but at runtime an error will be generated.  The solution
> here is to specify earlier versions of the library (5.1 for Lua) in
> config.nmake.
>
> I don't know if some of these issues have been solved and I only carry the
> changes in my local working copy for historical purposes, but they allow me
> to build a working Wireshark with VS2005 (obviously I don't see any 802.15.4
> frames).
>
> I don't have the time to push these changes upstream (particularly the
> changes to use the SDK version not the compiler as they are extensive),
> especially as VS2005 is now 2 versions off the latest compilers.  I can
> attach a patch that includes all my changes if you wish.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Graham Bloice
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to