On Mar 27, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > That patch is a Very Good Thing. I know we discussed a few tweaks (for > example it probably shouldn't imply -2?), but I think those and the > actual flag used are bike-shedding at this point. > > I still want to pick some nits, but I'm more than happy to commit the > current patch now so that at least there's *a* way to do it, even if > it's not the best way.
OK I attached it to bug 8223. I'm not claiming it's pretty though. :) >> I'll try running it with the pcap attached to the bug above to see if it >> resolves that issue. > > I strongly suspect it will if I'm understanding all the relevant > points, but verification would be nice. Yup, it worked. -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
